604.264.5550
  • Estate Litigation
    • Overview
    • Estate Litigation in BC
    • Disputing a Will in BC
    • Disinherited – Wills Variation in BC
    • FREE Estate Evaluation
  • Family Law
    • Divorce Lawyers
    • Family Property Lawyers
    • Separation Agreements
    • Spousal & Child Support
    • Free Family Law Evaluation
  • Personal Injury Claims
    • Brain Injuries
    • Chronic Pain
    • Critical Injuries
    • Spinal Cord Injuries
    • Personal Injury Law Overview
    • FREE Personal Injury Evaluation
  • About Us
    • Our Approach
    • Our Cases
    • thegoodfirm Lawyers
  • Blog
  • Contact Us

Failure to Pursue Rehab Program Results in Reduction of Award

December 1, 2016Amanda JamesUncategorizedNo comments

The goodfirm ICBC lawyers want to draw attention to a recent BC Supreme court case where a plaintiff’s failure to undergo a doctor recommended treatment program resulted in a reduction of the plaintiff’s award. In Lally v. He, 2016 BCSC 2187, a plaintiff’s award of damages was reduced for failing to attend a rehab program that would have helped with her post accident injuries. .

In Lally, Ms. L was injured when her car was struck by another car attempting to make a right turn on a red light. The other driver was at fault for the accident and Ms. L suffered significant pain in her back and shoulder as a result of the accident. At trial, she claimed for more than $650,000 for her injuries.

physiotherapy-1200x800Her doctor had recommended that she pursue an active rehabilitation program. She had attended a single session but had not but diligent in regularly doing her exercises and participating in additional sessions. The ICBC defendants took the position that the plaintiff’s award of damages should be reduced due to her failure to participate in the program. Ms. L had testified that she found it difficult to schedule sessions around her work but the court found that explanation was not reasonable.

In Chiu v. Chiu, 2002 BCCA 618, the court set out the test for establishing a plaintiff’s failure to mitigate. In order for a defendant to establish that a plaintiff has failed to mitigate by not pursuing a recommended treatment, the defendant must prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the plaintiff acted unreasonably in not pursuing the treatment and also the extent to which the plaintiff’s damages would have been reduced had the plaintiff undergone the treatment. Applying this test, Madam Justice Warren found that Ms. L would have had more improvement in her recovery had she fully participated in an active rehab program. As a result, she reduced Ms. L’s award by 10%.

In all personal injury cases, it is important to follow your doctor’s advice and recommended treatment. Not doing so leads to the risk that your eventual award of damages may be reduced.

Tags: active rehabilitation, car accident, icbc car accident lawyer, icbc lawyer, vancouver lawyer, vancouver personal injury lawyer

Related Articles

City Found Liable for Trip and Fall on Broken Sign

March 2, 2017Amanda James

Car Accident | Will a new car help?

February 6, 2017Amanda James

Plaintiff’s Part 7 Benefits Reinstated after BC Supreme Court Finds Against ICBC in Interpreting Key Legislation

September 1, 2016ashley

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Helping your kids buy their first house? Read this first!
  • Helping your kids buy their first house? Read This Cautionary Tale From the Court of Appeal
  • New Foreign Buyers Tax Not Grounds for Avoiding Real Estate Contract: BC Supreme Court Rules
  • Failure to Take Reasonable Offer to Settle Results in Costs Against Plaintiff
  • BC Supreme Court Varies Will to Provide for Testator’s Spouse

Archives

  • April 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • January 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • April 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • August 2012

Search

Quick LInks

  • Estate Litigation
  • Family Law
  • Personal Injury Claims
  • Blog
  • Contact Us in Vancouver
  • Sitemap

Location

Richter Trial Lawyers, Barristers and Solicitors
Suite 310 – 5687 Yew Street
Vancouver, BC V6M 3Y2
604.264.5550
info@richtertriallaw.com

Our Other Website

Bcestatelawyer.com Vancouverestatelawyer.com Thegoodfirm.lawyer

Follow Us

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn